<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wyden Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/</link>
	<description>A blog mainly (but not entirely) about health policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron E. Carroll: The Public Option Is Not Where You Draw the Line &#124; Yuvablog</title>
		<link>http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron E. Carroll: The Public Option Is Not Where You Draw the Line &#124; Yuvablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdcarroll.com/?p=177#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] on health care reform, I&#8217;ve never hidden my belief that a single-payer solution is the most cost-effective way to achieve universal coverage. I haven&#8217;t wavered.&#160; I still say that when asked, and I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on health care reform, I&rsquo;ve never hidden my belief that a single-payer solution is the most cost-effective way to achieve universal coverage. I haven&rsquo;t wavered.&nbsp; I still say that when asked, and I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron E. Carroll: The public option is not where you draw the line &#124; Obama Biden White House</title>
		<link>http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron E. Carroll: The public option is not where you draw the line &#124; Obama Biden White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdcarroll.com/?p=177#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] on health care reform, I&#8217;ve never hidden my belief that a single-payer solution is the most cost-effective way to achieve universal coverage. I haven&#8217;t wavered.&#160; I still say that when asked, and I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on health care reform, I&rsquo;ve never hidden my belief that a single-payer solution is the most cost-effective way to achieve universal coverage. I haven&rsquo;t wavered.&nbsp; I still say that when asked, and I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rational Arguments &#187; Bobby Jindal&#8217;s &#8220;new&#8221; ideas</title>
		<link>http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Arguments &#187; Bobby Jindal&#8217;s &#8220;new&#8221; ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdcarroll.com/?p=177#comment-14</guid>
		<description>[...] Sounds like an insurance exchange.  Sounds like the Wyden-Bennett bill.  In fact, sounds like he wants businesses allowed in the exchange, which many Republicans [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sounds like an insurance exchange.  Sounds like the Wyden-Bennett bill.  In fact, sounds like he wants businesses allowed in the exchange, which many Republicans [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rational Arguments &#187; The fate of the Wyden Amendment</title>
		<link>http://mdcarroll.com/2009/09/18/the-wyden-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Rational Arguments &#187; The fate of the Wyden Amendment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mdcarroll.com/?p=177#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] remember that one?  I devoted a pretty long post to it, in fact.  It had bipartisan support and might satisfy a number of competition/consumer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] remember that one?  I devoted a pretty long post to it, in fact.  It had bipartisan support and might satisfy a number of competition/consumer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
